
Product Manager × Product Designer
Do we really need both of them?
Table of Contents
Who owns a product problem—the Product Manager or the Product Designer?
PMs are tasked with solving problems. Designers are responsible for the user experience. Both aim to solve customer pain points. So why do teams need both? If the goal is simply to ship value, couldn’t one person do it?
The short answer: not if you want the product to last.
Who Owns What
Here’s how I draw the line:
- Product Manager owns the problem and the bet: what we’re solving, why it matters now, the outcome we expect, and the risks we accept.
- Product Designer owns the experience and the standard: how the solution should behave, how it should feel, and the principles the product refuses to break.
When those two drift apart—when the goal gets fuzzy or the experience gets contorted—the product groans. Sometimes you see it instantly in the metrics. Sometimes it shows up later as churn, mistrust, or a brand you can’t clean up.
Tension Is a Feature
That tension isn’t a bug; it’s a feature. Business pushes can erode experience. Perfect experiences without constraints rarely ship. The job isn’t to split the difference; it’s to search for a third option that raises the UX bar and hits the business goal.
If the only way to move a metric is to make the experience worse, two things might be true: the goal is misframed, or we haven’t designed creatively enough yet.
How to Find the Third Option
When that happens, I try to slow down just enough to speed up later. You can try following ideas when goals and UX clash:
- Restate the goal in customer language, not dashboard language.
- Make non‑negotiables visible: no surprise steps, no buried primaries, no extra taps to do the obvious thing.
- Put options on the table and test them on a real device. Ten minutes of tapping beats an hour of comment threads.
- Decide with dual lenses: a business outcome we believe in and a UX outcome we’re proud of.
If nothing clears both bars, we pause, refine the goal, and try again. Shipping UX debt “just this once” is how products age overnight.
Guardianship, Not Gatekeeping
Designers, in this model, aren’t just solution factories. They’re the guardians of simplicity, the people willing to say, “This goal is too ambiguous to produce a clean flow.” That isn’t stonewalling; it’s a service to the roadmap.
PMs, for our part, have to earn that challenge by making goals crisp, customer‑anchored, and testable—and by protecting time for exploration. You can’t demand a third option if you never fund the search for it.
Designers guard simplicity; PMs guard clarity. Together, they protect the roadmap from ambiguous goals and rushed solutions.
Complexity Is a Signal
I treat complex UX as an alarm bell, not a cost of doing business. If the only way something “works” is by burying a primary task, the business goal probably isn’t right yet. Features that look great on a sheet but don’t help the user rarely compound. Clarity does. Removing the shiny extra—so the core job becomes obvious—often lifts both experience and revenue over the long run.
Two hands, one instrument
So, do we really need both roles? Absolutely.
PM and Design are not opposing tribes. They’re two hands on the same instrument: problem clarity and solution clarity, pulling together. The conflict is the music. When we use it well, challenging vague goals, defending simple experiences, and insisting on that third option, we ship products people choose again and again. That, more than any dashboard spike, is the business outcome worth chasing.
MJ Kang Newsletter
Join the newsletter to receive the latest updates in your inbox.